I help early-stage founders fix their narrative, before VCs and CISOs do it for them, less kindly. VCs buy visions; CISOs and customers buy reality. The gap between the two is where Seed rounds and first enterprise pilots quietly die.
Run by someone who's actually built and run security programs, not someone who read a deck about them. I tell founders the truth while it's cheap to hear it.
I'm Mike Geehan, and Triarch Security is me. Not a fund, not a logo wall, not a “we.” Most recently I ran Security & Technology at Cockroach Labs, where I built the program from nothing: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 and 42001, PCI-DSS across AWS, Azure, and GCP, plus an AI governance program built before anyone had agreed what “AI governance” even meant.
Before that, security leadership at Akamai and ID.me, and twelve years running professional services at HP. And two decades back I co-founded a software company, so I've sat in the founder's chair too, sweating the pitch and the payroll.
That's the whole point of the three pillars below. Most advisors have lived in one of them. I've lived in all three. And I'll tell you which of yours is about to give, minus the flattery.
Most advisors live in one of these. I've lived in all three: founder, security leader, and the person who stood up AI governance before the standard existed. Each practice runs on its own triad, and the danger is always the seam between them. That's the whole point of the name.
Product-market fit pressure-tested across three things a skeptical VC or CISO will weigh at once: the story you tell, the proof behind it, and the spine carrying it.
The pitch, the narrative, the product-market-fit claim. What you tell investors and buyers about why you matter.
Your security posture, your compliance reality, the technical substance. What's actually true when a skeptic checks.
The founders, the early hires, the operators who carry the program. What VCs and CISOs are really betting on, long before the tech matters.
Every team you have is already piloting AI, sanctioned or not. I lead organizations through adoption that's actually safe: governance built to speed the rollout, not stall it. Policy, process, and tooling, with the guardrails on from day one.
Acceptable-use, model and data governance, and standards aligned to ISO 42001 and the NIST AI RMF. Written to survive an audit and a board question, not to die in a wiki nobody reads.
Intake and risk review for new AI use cases, vendor and model assessment, human-in-the-loop checkpoints, and clear incident paths, embedded into how teams already work so adoption accelerates instead of routing around you.
Selection, configuration, and rollout of AI tools and agents with the guardrails on from day one: access, data boundaries, logging, and monitoring. Shadow AI brought into the light, not just banned.
The embedded version of the work: stand up the program, run operations day to day, and carry the authority in the diligence calls and board conversations a founder shouldn't be answering alone.
Framework, standards, and roadmap: SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS. The first hires and the evidence engine. Your org stops looking like a compliance checkbox and starts looking like a company.
The program kept alive between audits: risk decisions, vendor reviews, incident response, and the steady cadence that keeps posture real instead of a point-in-time screenshot.
Board-ready reporting, contract redlining, and executive presence in procurement, diligence, and the late-stage customer questions a founder shouldn't be the one answering.
Plenty of good people sell access. I sell readiness, the part that has to be true first.
Start with a 90-minute Teardown, scope a fixed-price sprint, buy time by the hour, or bring me in on retainer. Each one maps to one of the three pillars above. I don't sell anyone more than the problem needs.
A set price, a set timeline, a hardened artifact at the end. Start small with a Teardown, or scope a full sprint when one arch is bleeding.
Review by the hour, or a light monthly slot. Judgment on tap, without signing up for a project.
Ongoing technical authority across all three pillars. For when you've outgrown one-off fixes.
Ninety minutes, live and recorded: I tear into your deck and pitch as the skeptical investor and the skeptical technical buyer at once. You get a written trust-gap punch list within 48 hours, every hole ranked by what kills the round fastest. Built to be a yes when a full sprint isn't.
The full rebuild. I pressure-test the pitch, deck, and PMF claim, then hand back four artifacts: a trust-gap audit, the exact questions a skeptical buyer will ask with your answers, a narrative hardened to survive diligence, and a fix list ranked by deal impact.
Your $950 Teardown fee is credited if you upgrade within 30 days.
Make your security real, then make it legible to whoever's checking. Compliance alignment, AI governance, and a posture that survives a Fortune 500 review, all in one engagement.
Stand up AI governance that speeds the rollout instead of stalling it: acceptable-use and model/data policy aligned to ISO 42001 and the NIST AI RMF, an intake-and-risk-review process teams will actually follow, and your AI tools and agents deployed with the guardrails on from day one. Shadow AI brought into the light, not just banned.
Stand up the early security function: framework, standards, the first hires, the evidence engine. Your org stops looking like a compliance checkbox and starts looking like a company.
An advisory board built to throw off real signal instead of sitting on a slide as a vanity metric. Recruitment, structure, a compensation framework, and neutral facilitation so the feedback actually lands.
Judgment on tap, without a project. Buy time by the hour for an ad-hoc review (a new deck, a board doc, a security questionnaire that just landed in your inbox), or hold a standing monthly slot for ongoing access.
The embedded version. Senior security leadership, board-ready reporting, contract redlining, and executive presence for enterprise negotiations. All of it without a $400k full-time hire on the books.
Retainer terms scoped per engagement, including a continuous-PMF / lightweight-advisory variant.
Better me than the market. Find the gap in private, while it's still cheap to fix.
Let's talk →I make a living telling founders the hard version. Here's what they say once the work is done.
From our first conversation, Mike provided detailed, actionable feedback on what our product needed to address. He understood our position as a service provider and offered practical advice as we grew. Deeply active in the security community and very well connected, he introduced us to folks who shared valuable perspectives from many angles. Mike played a real role in elevating our position in the market.
Working with Mike reshaped how we talk about CognitivTrust. We came in still working through our value proposition and the right way to frame the messaging; Mike helped us find the version of the story that actually lands with CISOs and gives us a clear way to communicate the value we deliver. What makes him a rare find as an advisor is the way he engages: responsive, patient, and willing to read between the lines of what you're trying to say. He adjusts to your pace, your priorities, and your expectations and the work gets sharper for it.
We brought Mike in to pressure-test our product-market fit, and he did. His feedback and guidance as CISO was priceless. But the real unlock was a partnership he proposed which would deepen our ecosystem integration and open revenue paths. He then helped us actually build it by facilitating introductions. It's becoming a dependable way for us to grow.
Better than from a VC or a customer later. Book a call, or send a note and I'll reply within 48 hours.